Diddy could see his high-profile federal trial unravel dramatically as legal analyst Dr. Phil McGraw warned the prosecution’s case—built on emotionally charged testimony and sweeping allegations—may not meet the legal threshold required for conviction.
Now, four weeks into proceedings, the music mogul is facing serious federal charges, including racketeering, sex trafficking and transporting individuals for prostitution.
However, according to Dr. Phil, the government’s case may be legally flimsy despite its emotional weight.
“They may have thought their evidence against Combs was so emotionally powerful, so sensational that a jury would be so offended that they’d convict Combs regardless of whether the facts precisely line up with the charges,” Dr. Phil told The Daily Mail.
Dr. Phil believed the defense would ask for a directed verdict, also known as a judgment as a matter of law, which would allow U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian to dismiss the case before it reaches the jury if he determines the prosecution hasn’t presented enough evidence to support a conviction.
The most scrutinized testimony came from Cassie Ventura, Diddy’s former partner, who took the stand on Tuesday and Wednesday (May 13–14).
Her account painted a disturbing picture of abuse and coercion, but Dr. Phil argued that her testimony, while emotionally impactful, may not satisfy the legal standards for the crimes charged.
“None of that is illegal in and of itself,” Dr. Phil argued.
The prosecution’s reliance on Ventura as a central witness has raised eyebrows, especially given her complicated personal history with Diddy. Dr. Phil said the legal bar for proving a RICO conspiracy or sex trafficking is far higher than simply presenting disturbing anecdotes.
“The prosecution may have overcharged this case—by sipping on what I call ‘sweet poison,’” Dr. Phil said.
Dr. Phil likened the situation to the infamous O.J. Simpson trial, highlighting the disparity between public perception and legal evidence.
Legal experts say the defense is likely to file a motion for a directed verdict in the coming days, potentially ending the trial before the jury even deliberates.
If granted, it would be a major blow to the government’s case and a stunning turn in one of the most closely watched celebrity trials in years.
The trial remains ongoing as of Tuesday (June 10).
