The Federal Excessive Courtroom in Abuja has scheduled September 28 because the day when a call can be reached in a swimsuit in search of an order for INEC to strike out Timipre Sylva‘s identify from the record of candidates working within the Bayelsa November 11 governorship ballot.
The plaintiff within the case is Chief Demesuoyefa Kolomo, who’s affiliated with the All Progressives Congress (APC).
After listening to the arguments and displays of Prof. Abiodun Amuda-Kannike, SAN, counsel for Kolomo, and Babayemi Olaniyan, the lawyer representing Sylva, in addition to Dr Denis Otiotio, representing the APC, Justice Donatus Okorowo set the date for the judgment.
In accordance with NAN, Kolomo, who’s affiliated with the APC, has filed a swimsuit requesting the courtroom to order INEC to take away Sylva’s identify from the record of candidates competing within the governorship ballot scheduled for November 11.
Within the originating summons, dated June 13 and marked as FHC/ABJ/CS/821/2023, Kolomo instituted authorized proceedings in opposition to Sylva, the previous Minister of State for Petroleum; the APC; and INEC, naming them as the primary, second, and third defendants, respectively.
Kolomo sought the courtroom’s willpower on whether or not Sylva is eligible to take part within the election, contemplating his prior tenures because the governor of Bayelsa from Could 29, 2007, to April 15, 2008, and Could 27, 2008, to January 27, 2012.
The affidavit submitted by Kolomo contains his affirmation that, other than being a member of the APC, he’s additionally a registered voter within the state.
Kolomo talked about that INEC had lately launched the record of governorship candidates for the state, which included Sylva’s identify.
Kolomo cited his motivation for pursuing the case as the necessity to vindicate Sections 180(2)(a) and 182(1)(b) of the 1999 Structure, guarantee respect for the rule of legislation, and decide the relevance of those constitutional provisions to Sylva contemplating the information introduced.
In his submission, Kolomo highlighted that the difficulty raised within the lawsuit had constitutional implications and carried substantial significance to him and fellow voters within the state. He emphasised the significance of making certain that voters don’t waste their votes by unknowingly supporting a candidate who doesn’t meet the {qualifications} to contest within the election.
Nonetheless, Sylva submitted a counter affidavit, presenting his argument for the swimsuit’s dismissal as a result of its lack of advantage.
Sylva, represented by his lawyer, Olaniyan, asserted that he was by no means elected because the governor of the state on two events.
He said that in keeping with the judgment of the Courtroom of Attraction, the election that led to Sylva’s assumption of workplace because the governor of Bayelsa in 2007 was deemed null and void. Consequently, the courtroom directed INEC to arrange a contemporary election inside a span of 90 days.
Learn additionally: Nigeria To End Fuel Importation By 2024 – Timipre Sylva
The lawyer conceded that Sylva had held the place of governor of Bayelsa however emphasised that he had been elected to the place on just one event.
He sought the courtroom’s dismissal of the swimsuit.
In settlement with Olaniyan’s assertions, Otiotio, representing the APC, urged the courtroom to dismiss the swimsuit and require the plaintiff to bear substantial prices.
Otiotio, in the midst of the preliminary objection, asserted that Kolomo didn’t possess the authorized standing (locus standi) to carry forth the swimsuit since he didn’t contest within the major election that produced Sylva as a candidate.
Amuda-Kannike, in his presentation, refuted the opposing counsel’s assertion by stating that Kolomo had authorized standing (locus) to file the swimsuit underneath the legislation, no matter whether or not it was categorized as a pre-election matter or not.
He maintained that the sections and instances referenced by the protection weren’t related to the matter being addressed within the current swimsuit.
He countered their argument by stating that the swimsuit was not statute-barred, highlighting the importance of the ultimate day on which the record of candidates was printed as an necessary side of their case.
The senior lawyer requested the courtroom to help their case and reject the protection’s preliminary objection.
Moreover, it was talked about that Justice Inyang Ekwo, in a distinct matter filed by an APC aspirant within the major election, has decided September 22 because the date for the supply of a judgment.
